Stakeholders like Mosh Mulla demand public updates, independent evaluations, and policy adjustments
The allocation of over 30 billion Ugandan shillings to the artists and creative industry over the past five years has raised urgent questions about the use and impact of these public resources.
Despite the significant financial injection, there is a noticeable absence of tangible infrastructure development
No recording studios have been constructed, no physical facilities established, and no industry labels set up to support talent growth.
As a media personality, I’m asking:
- Where did the funds go? What specific programs or projects received the money, and what were their intended outcomes?
- What measurable impact has been achieved?
Any documented improvements in artist productivity, music distribution, or industry revenue linked to the funding?
- Why is no physical infrastructure? What plans existed for building studios or hubs, and what obstacles prevented implementation?
- _How was transparency ensured? Were there audits or public reports tracking fund disbursement and utilization?
- What’s the plan for future oversight? How will the government guarantee forthcoming investments yield concrete benefits for the creative sector?
Way Forward
The creative industry plays a vital role in cultural expression and economic growth. Authorities must provide clear accounts of how public money was managed and outline a strategic roadmap for future investments prioritizing infrastructure, talent development, and transparency.
Stakeholders should demand public updates, independent evaluations, and policy adjustments to ensure financial support translates into sustainable industry advancements.
Sapiosexual & Ambivert
